• Skip to content
  • Skip to navigation

Grant Thornton Australia

Grant Thornton uses cookies to monitor the performance of this website and improve user experience.

If you are happy to accept cookies from this site, please check the box.

To find out more about cookies, what they are and how we use them, please see our privacy notice, which also provides information on how to delete cookies from your hard drive.

How to be COVIDSafe when visiting Grant Thornton offices. Find out how

Global site
  • Global site
Grant Thorton Logo

Grant Thornton Logo Grant Thornton Logo

Contact us
  • Insights
  • Services
  • Industries
  • Meet our people
  • Careers
  • News centre
  • Locations
  • About us
  • Audit
  • Tax
  • Risk
  • Forensics
  • Deals
  • Finance and funding
  • Insolvency
  • Restructuring and turnaround
  • Business services
  • Consulting

  • Market services
  • Asia
  • Indigenous advisory
Audit Home
  • Compliance audits & reviews
  • Audit quality
  • Financial reporting advisory
  • Audit advisory
Tax Home
  • Corporate tax & advisory
  • Private business tax & advisory
  • Tax compliance
  • Employment tax
  • International tax
  • GST, stamp duty & indirect tax
  • Tax law
  • Research and development & government incentives
  • Data transformation and analytics
  • Corporate simplification
Risk Home
  • Payroll assurance
  • Cyber resilience
  • Internal audit
  • Financial crime
  • Consumer Data Right
  • Risk management
  • Controls assurance
  • Governance
  • Regulatory compliance
Forensics Home
  • Forensic accounting and dispute advisory
  • Investigations
  • Digital forensics
  • eDiscovery
Deals Home
  • Mergers and acquisitions
  • Acquisition search & strategy
  • Divestments
  • Operation deal services
  • Transaction advisory
  • Business valuations
  • Tax in mergers & acquisition
Finance and funding Home
  • Corporate finance
  • Debt advisory
  • Working capital optimisation
  • Capital markets
  • Capital raising
  • Private equity
  • Financial modelling
  • Payments advisory
Insolvency Home
  • Voluntary administration & DOCA
  • Corporate insolvency & liquidation
  • Complex and international insolvency
  • Safe Harbour advisory
  • Bankruptcy and personal insolvency
  • Creditor advisory services
  • Small business restructuring process
Restructuring and turnaround Home
  • Independent business reviews
  • Commercial performance
  • Safe Harbour advisory
  • Corporate simplification
  • Director advisory services
  • Debt advisory
Business services Home
  • Business planning & strategy
  • Private business company secretarial services
  • Outsourced accounting services
  • Superannuation and SMSF
  • Management reporting
  • Financial reporting
  • Forecasting & budgeting
  • ATO audit support
  • Family business consulting
  • Private business taxation and structuring
  • Outsourced CFO services
Consulting Home
  • Management consulting
  • Technology consulting
  • Financial consulting
Asia Home
  • China
  • India
  • Japan
  • Case study: Restructuring solutions
  • Agribusiness, food & beverage
  • Automotive dealers
  • Education
  • Energy & resources
  • Financial services
  • Health & aged care
  • Life sciences
  • Manufacturing
  • Not for Profit
  • Professional services
  • Public sector
  • Real estate & construction
  • Retail & consumer products
  • Technology & media
Agribusiness, food & beverage Home
Bite Size Dealtracker Food, Beverage & Agribusiness industry insights
Key insights for the Australian Food, Beverage & Agribusiness industry.
Financial services Home
  • Banking
  • Fintech
  • Private Health Insurance
  • Superannuation
  • Asset management
  • BEAR FAQs
  • Open banking
Royal Commission wrap up Top 10 things for Financial Services providers
Eleven months on from the first round of hearings for the Royal Commission into Misconduct in the Banking, Superannuation and Financial Services Industry, Commissioner Hayne’s final report has been released.
Health & aged care Home
Aged Care Royal Commission Perspectives on the Future of Ageing
Transitions in ageing are not consistent and systematic as they are described by our ageing systems. Sometimes they are incremental, sometimes accidental, sometimes monumental, and they are always personal. We can create something better.
Life sciences Home
Biotechnology Industry Position survey Australia's biotechnology industry drives economic growth
The 2019 Biotechnology Industry Position survey conducted by Ausbiotech and supported by Grant Thornton has revealed that new technologies across regenerative medicine and medicinal cannabis are disrupting the industry, and Australia's global strength in clinical trials continues to drive contributions to the economic and social fabric of the country.
Manufacturing Home
mid-sized business report Manufacturing is critical to our economy – how can we support the sector?
Although the knock-on effects of the Australian automotive industry exiting our country are yet to be fully understood, the industry is evolving, and manufacturing continues to be a major employer and critical to our overall economy.
Not for Profit Home
NATIONAL OUTCOMES MEASUREMENT PROGRAM A practical framework
Royal Commissions and federal budgets are critical things for Nonprofit human service providers to be thinking about at this point in time.
Real estate & construction Home
mid-sized business report Supporting affordable housing requires planning, certainty – and tax reform
There is a lot of noise around the property sector at the moment – and it’s not all positive. Prices are down – but this shouldn’t be a surprise when some markets (namely Sydney & Melbourne) saw unprecedented hikes in recent years.
Retail & consumer products Home
GNC Group Consulting The Technology Trap: Online innovation in retail
I recently attended the NRF Retail Big Show in New York, an overwhelming smorgasbord of retail technology and new store concepts.
Technology & media Home
  • Telecommunications
Scaling-up for Growth From start-up to scale-up
Navigating the complexities of growth and maintaining previous success is a challenge for all mid-size businesses.
  • Working at Grant Thornton
  • Student opportunities
  • Experienced careers
  • Contact us
Working at Grant Thornton Home
  • Flexibility
  • Your career and development
  • Diversity and inclusion
  • In the community
  • What we offer you
Student opportunities Home
  • Graduates
  • Vacationer Program
  • The application process
  • FAQs
  • Student application tips and tricks
  • Positions available
Experienced careers Home
  • Client spotlight
  • Positions available
  1. Grant Thornton Australia | Audit, Tax and Advisory
  2. Client alerts
  3. 2021
  4. The continuing evolution of stamp duty

When “land” does not mean land and “fixed” does not mean fixed – the continuing evolution of stamp duty

23 Mar 2021
  • The continuing evolution of stamp duty

Yesterday, RevenueWA issued Revenue Ruling DA26.0 (“Ruling”) which sets out its interpretation of major amendments which commenced on 13 June 2019, some 21 months ago. While the guidance is welcome, it is not necessarily good news for taxpayers.

While the amendments were comprehensive, and changed a number of provisions in the Duties Act 2008 (WA), the Ruling focuses on the meaning of things “fixed to land” and fixed infrastructure rights.  While the concept of “fixed to land” (as distinct from a “fixture”) is now commonplace in Australian stamp duty law, fixed infrastructure rights are unique to Western Australia.  The changes were promoted as making it easier to determine whether a transaction is subject to duty and to prevent synthetic arrangements which technically circumvented the Western Australian duty net, with the result that the duty net has been significantly widened, and now catches more transaction than it otherwise would have.

Both the concepts of fixed to land and fixed infrastructure rights broaden the meaning of “land” or “land asset” to things which are not taken to be land for any other legal (or accounting) purpose.

Things fixed to land

The concept of things “fixed to land” or things “fixed to the land” has now been introduced in duties legislation across Australia except the Australian Capital Territory. While it has expanded the duty base, the policy justification has been to take away the technical legal difference between fixtures and chattels (or goods), with a “fixture” requiring an objective intention for the thing to be permanently fixed to the land for the better use and enjoyment of the land.  The expanded concept of “fixed to land” has sought to remove the objective intention test.  Practically, this has meant that when asking clients to identify things which are “fixed” for duty purposes, the usual message is whether the thing is somehow physically fixed to land by more than its own weight (eg bolted to a floor, wall or ceiling, even for stability purposes).

The Ruling goes further than that. 

The Ruling makes it clear that RevenueWA will treat something that is not physically “fixed to land” by more than its own weight (ie merely resting on the ground) as “fixed to land” in circumstances where “it is rendered immovable”.  While such a thing might be a “fixture” (and therefore already taken to be land under normal principles), ordinary logic is not likely to conclude it is “fixed”.  The example used is railway infrastructure as fixed even though its component parts merely rest on the ground, with counterexamples that portable toilets, industrial bins, shipping containers and photocopiers are not fixed.  In our experience, there are many examples of things which fall between a railway line and a shipping container, particularly in the context of a manufacturing facility, which makes it difficult to determine where the line is.

It seems to us that if a crane or gantry can merely pick something up from the factory floor and move it, it should not be “fixed”.  However, if it needs to be destroyed in order to move it, it is “fixed” even though it might just be resting on the ground.  That is not to say that is the bright line test for all assets, and there are undoubtedly many examples in between these broad concepts, with the result that many assets need to be considered on a case by case basis. 

You might think that such nuanced concepts are pretty subtle (and perhaps absurd) just to determine the extent to which duty is payable on a transaction, but unfortunately these are everyday conversations when advising on these transactions, and without proper advice, it is easy to come to the (incorrect) conclusion that a transaction is not exposed to duty.

Fixed infrastructure rights – taxing infrastructure transactions

The concept of fixed infrastructure rights is unique to Western Australia, and designed to prevent synthetic “land” transactions from escaping duty.  Nevertheless, the Ruling identifies that ordinary commercial transactions, which are not structured to avoid duty, can also be caught.

The clearest examples are that the operator of a power generation facility or railway, which are taken to hold a “land asset” even though they are merely an operator of the infrastructure and do not actually hold any interest in land.  Another example is a Private Public Partnership (or PPP), particularly one that involves social infrastructure (eg, prison, sporting stadium, railway or schools).  Typically these transactions are quite properly structured as giving the consortium a long term right by way of licence to operate the asset which it has just built in partial consideration for the risk and expense of construction.  It is seen as the conventional and economically efficient way to deliver major infrastructure in Australia, particularly for government and quasi-government bodies, and is not typically designed with a purpose of duty avoidance. 

It would seem that while RevenueWA will not seek to tax the entry into PPP arrangements, it does intend to tax the later selldown of the project in its operation phase.  Such cost should now be built into the economic model, even at the start, as a later buyer will need to factor duty at up to 5.15% on its acquisition.  While this would already be the outcome for a PPP which is based on a lease (such as a toll road) in other States and Territories, it is a distinct difference in tax treatment for social infrastructure PPPs, with the tax ultimately needing to be built into the cost of acquiring an interest in new or existing Western Australian infrastructure.

For more information, please contact:

Steven Paterson
Steven Paterson
Partner Sydney
Email address https://www.linkedin.com/in/stevenpaterson/ Steven Paterson VCard
View full profile

Subscribe to receive our publications

Subscribe now to be kept up-to-date with timely and relevant insights, unique to the nature of your business, your areas of interest and the industry in which you operate.

Subscribe

Share this page
  • Share this page on Facebook LinkedIn
  • Share this page on Twitter Twitter
  • Share this page on LinkedIn LinkedIn
  • Share this page on Wechat WeChat
  • Share this page via email Email
  • Grant Thornton on Youtube
  • LinkedIn icon
  • Twitter icon
  • Facebook icon
Connectclose
  • Contact us
  • Locations
  • Meet our people
  • Subscribe
  • Staff portal
Aboutclose
  • About us
  • Careers
  • News centre
  • Client alerts
  • Grant Thornton Foundation
  • Grant Thornton Affinity
Legalclose
  • Privacy
  • Compliance and ethics
  • Disclaimer
  • Site map

© 2021 Grant Thornton Australia Limited – All rights reserved

    • EN
    • Contact us