High Court decision strengthens GST refund positions for developers
Client AlertHigh Court decision strengthens GST refund positions for developers
Federal Budget Virtual Seminar: expert insights on spending, tax reform and policy impacts. Register now.
The ATO released the draft for A New Tax System (Goods and Services Tax) Margin Scheme Valuation Requirements Determination 2022 (LI 2022/D14) in response to the decision in Decleah Investments Pty Ltd and Anor as Trustee for the PRS Unit Trust v Commissioner of Taxation [2021] AATA 4821.
In this case, the ATO was disputing the taxpayers margin scheme valuation of $22m and considered the correct margin scheme valuation was much lower at $8.1m.
However, the issue was not whether the taxpayer’s valuation was correct – but whether it was an ‘approved valuation’ for the purposes of Division 75 of the GST Act. Essentially, a valuation is considered an ‘approved valuation’ under the current determination if it is not contrary to professional standards.
The ATO’s expert witness conceded that the while the taxpayer’s valuation ‘was not consistent with customary professional practice and might not be consistent with professional standards’, it was not contrary to professional standards. As such, the court found that the taxpayer’s valuation was an ‘approved valuation’ for GST purposes.
In the draft determination, the ATO seeks to increase the requirements for a valuation to be an ‘approved valuation’. Specifically, the valuation would need to meet the following two additional requirements to be an ‘approved valuation’ for GST purposes.
Firstly, the valuation will need to be made in a manner and in a form that complies with all legal and professional standards recognised in Australia, as identified and advised by the valuer's accrediting professional industry body (or bodies), and that are effective at the date of issue of the valuation. Currently it’s sufficient for the valuation to be made in a manner that is not contrary to the professional standards recognised in Australia.
Secondly, the valuation report will need to include the following additional information:
While we don’t anticipate that these additional requirements will cause issues for property developers obtaining new valuations, any existing valuations that don’t meet these additional requirements will only be valid for a three month transitional period.
As such, property developers may be required to obtain replacement valuations for any sales of real property that occur outside of the three month transitional period. We consider that this may be problematic for those property developers that are undertaking staged developments that take years to conclude.
The draft determination is open for comment until 12 October 2022. During this time, we will be consulting with property developers, property valuers and other relevant parties to understand the potential impact of this draft determination, and this will form the basis of our submission to the ATO.
Please don’t hesitate to get in contact to discuss.
High Court decision strengthens GST refund positions for developers
In this episode, Principal and National Head of Private Business & Tax Advisory Technical Tax, David Montani, Specialist Tax Partner and National Head of Real Estate & Construction Anika Reside and Corporate Tax Partner Mark D’Angelica discuss the outcomes of the Economic Reform Roundtable, why tax reform has historically been challenging in Australia, and their ideal tax mix for a more productive and prosperous nation.
The ATO’s GSTD 2025/1 clarifies the GST treatment of prepared meals following the Simplot case. Learn how the new four-step test and transitional compliance approach affect food suppliers.