High Court decision strengthens GST refund positions for developers
Client AlertHigh Court decision strengthens GST refund positions for developers
Federal Budget Virtual Seminar: expert insights on spending, tax reform and policy impacts. Register now.

In this conversation, Anika Reside, National Head of Real Estate and Construction, and George Sinanis, Corporate Tax Partner, discuss the main funding options available to overseas developers, the tax treatment of debt and equity, and the recent reforms increasing scrutiny on cross-border funding structures.
Listen back for practical insights into where funding structures can come under pressure and why getting the position right early can shape outcomes over the life of an Australian development.
Overseas property developers typically fund Australian projects through equity, debt or a combination of both. Under Australian tax rules, however, the treatment of a funding instrument depends on its substance rather than the label attached to it, making classification an important issue from the outset.
Once a funding arrangement is treated as debt or equity, the tax implications can differ significantly. Equity funding will generally give rise to dividend returns, while debt funding can support interest deductibility, but the withholding tax treatment and overall tax outcome for investors may differ.
Debt has often been viewed as the more tax-effective funding option, but Australia’s thin capitalisation changes have made that position harder to rely on. For property developers, particularly in the early stages of a development, earnings-based limits can restrict deductions even where borrowing is commercially justified.
Related party funding introduces another layer of complexity. New debt deduction creation rules can restrict deductions in some financing arrangements, while transfer pricing rules apply across cross-border funding more broadly. Together, they increase the need to assess not only whether deductions are available, but whether the overall arrangement can be supported.
Funding decisions are far easier to address at the start of a project than after a structure has been implemented. Early advice and upfront modelling can help overseas property developers test assumptions, compare options and make more informed decisions from day one.
For overseas property developers, funding an Australian project requires a clear view of how tax treatment, deductibility, withholding, related party arrangements and transfer pricing requirements come together in practice.
We work with clients to assess funding options, test structures early and identify issues before they affect project outcomes. Whether you are entering the Australian market, reviewing an existing arrangement or planning your next development, we can help you navigate the tax and structuring considerations with greater confidence.

Supporting the sector as it navigates continued economic and social shifts
High Court decision strengthens GST refund positions for developers
Explores proposed CGT discount and negative gearing reforms and what they could mean for investors.
Geopolitical shocks are reshaping supply chains – what this means for tax, trade, GST and Incoterms control.