Australian construction industry: Key pressures and how the tax system can help
InsightsExplore tax strategies to manage labour, fuel, import and cash flow pressures in construction.
Remarkable Journeys with Jess Fox: Conversations with our clients, people and community. Listen now.
What overseas developers need to know

Funding is often approached with a preferred structure in mind, but Australian tax rules don’t always align with those assumptions. Classification, deductibility and cross-border considerations can interact in ways that are not immediately obvious – particularly as recent reforms place greater scrutiny on how arrangements are designed and supported.
Anika Reside, National Head of Real Estate and Construction, and George Sinanis, Corporate Tax Partner, examine the practical implications of these issues and the key considerations for overseas developers when approaching funding decisions in Australia.
Overseas property developers typically fund Australian projects through equity, debt or a combination of both. Under Australian tax rules, however, the treatment of a funding instrument depends on its substance rather than the label attached to it, making classification an important issue from the outset.
Once a funding arrangement is treated as debt or equity, the tax implications can differ significantly. Equity funding will generally give rise to dividend returns, while debt funding can support interest deductibility, but the withholding tax treatment and overall tax outcome for investors may differ.
Debt has often been viewed as the more tax-effective funding option, but Australia’s thin capitalisation changes have made that position harder to rely on. For property developers, particularly in the early stages of a development, earnings-based limits can restrict deductions even where borrowing is commercially justified.
Related party funding introduces another layer of complexity. New debt deduction creation rules can restrict deductions in some financing arrangements, while transfer pricing rules apply across cross-border funding more broadly. Together, they increase the need to assess not only whether deductions are available, but whether the overall arrangement can be supported.
Funding decisions are far easier to address at the start of a project than after a structure has been implemented. Early advice and upfront modelling can help overseas property developers test assumptions, compare options and make more informed decisions from day one.
For overseas property developers, funding an Australian project requires a clear view of how tax treatment, deductibility, withholding, related party arrangements and transfer pricing requirements come together in practice.
We work with clients to assess funding options, test structures early and identify issues before they affect project outcomes. Whether you are entering the Australian market, reviewing an existing arrangement or planning your next development, we can help you navigate the tax and structuring considerations with greater confidence.

Supporting the sector as it navigates continued economic and social shifts
Explore tax strategies to manage labour, fuel, import and cash flow pressures in construction.
From 1 July 2026, two significant changes take effect: Payday Super will require superannuation to be paid with every payroll run, and reforms to the superannuation guarantee charge framework will substantially increase the financial consequences of non-compliance. For real estate and construction businesses that rely heavily on contractors, the pressure to identify and manage super obligations correctly, and early, has never been greater.
High Court decision strengthens GST refund positions for developers