Major change in proposed 30 per cent minimum tax on trusts
InsightNew “EET election” option for discretionary trusts to avoid the minimum 30 per cent without having to restructure, but creates inflexibility.
Grant Thornton Australia joins Grant Thornton Advisors multinational platform. Read more.
26 Jun 2025 6 min read

The proposed Division 296 tax legislation includes several critical components:
Unrealised gains refer to the increase in the value of investments that have not been sold. Taxing these gains raises several issues, including the potential for individuals to pay tax on ‘imaginary profits’ if the value of their investments subsequently declines.
If an individual experiences negative earnings or their TSB falls below $3m, no refund is available for Division 296 tax paid in a prior year. Instead, losses can be carried forward to offset future Division 296 earnings. In some instances, these losses may never be utilised.
Step 1: Calculate the earnings, defined as the movement in the individual's total superannuation balance adjusted for any withdrawals and net contributions.
Step 2: Determine the proportion of earnings attributable to the balance above $3 million.
Step 3: Apply a 15 per cent tax rate to the earnings amount derived from the previous steps.
The tax is assessed per individual, aggregating all their superannuation accounts. For those with a Self-Managed Superannuation Fund (SMSF), each member’s balance is assessed individually.
To illustrate the potential impact of Division 296, consider the following case studies:
Anne has a superannuation balance of $3.2m at the end of the financial year and no contributions or withdrawals. Her balance increases to $3.4m the following year. The tax liability is calculated based on the proportion of earnings above $3m, resulting in a relatively modest tax amount. The following steps to calculate this are:
Earnings = ($3.4M + $0 – $0) - $3.2M = $200K
Proportion = $3.4M - $3M ÷ $3.4M = 11.76%
Division 296 Tax Liability
= $200K x 11.76% x 15%
= $3,528
Bob has a superannuation balance of $9m, which increases to $9.5m the following year. The tax liability for Bob is significantly higher due to the larger proportion of earnings above the $3m threshold. The following steps to calculate this are:
Earnings = ($9.5M + $0 – $0) - $9M = $500K
Proportion = $9.5M - $3M ÷ $9.5M = 68.42%
Division 296 Tax Liability
=$500K x 68.42% x 15%
= $51,315
Gail has a superannuation balance of $5m, which increases to $5.3m the following year. Gail makes concessional contributions of $30,000 and takes pension withdrawals of $150,000. The following steps to calculate this are:
Earnings = ($5.3M + $150,000 – $25,500) - $5M = $424,500
Proportion = $5.3M - $3M ÷ $5.3M = 43.40%
Division 296 Tax Liability
= $424,500 x 43.40% x 15%
= $27,635
John has a superannuation balance of $3.2m, which decreases to $2.9m the following year. John takes pension/lump sum withdrawals of $400k. The following steps to calculate this are:
Earnings = ($2.9M + $400K - $0) - $3.2M = $100K
Proportion = $2.9M - $3M ÷ $2.9M = negative 3.45%
Division 296 Tax Liability = Nil due to negative proportion
With the tax expected to apply for the 2026 financial year, even with a start date of 1 July 2025, there is still time to assess any plans and implement strategies prior to 30 June 2026 to reduce the impact of the Division 296 tax.
It’s critical to wait until the final legislation is passed rather than withdrawing funds prematurely in anticipation of the tax, as re-contribution may not be possible if the legislation does not proceed as expected.
Selling investments prematurely will only trigger capital gains tax consequences, it will not impact the amount of Division 296 tax, which is based on the balance movement.
For many, superannuation will remain a tax-effective structure even with the new tax. For others, it may be an opportunity to review their current and alternative investment vehicles to identify the most tax effective strategies moving forward.
Division 296 represents a significant change for individuals with high superannuation balances. It is crucial for individuals to seek tailored advice and plan accordingly to navigate these changes and the implications for their superannuation and wealth strategies. If you’d like to discuss your current superannuation strategy, please reach out to one of our experts today.
The above information is provided as an information service only and, therefore, does not constitute financial product advice and should not be relied upon as financial product advice. None of the information provided takes into account your personal objectives, financial situation or needs. You must determine whether the information is appropriate in terms of your particular circumstances. For financial product advice that takes account of your particular objectives, financial situation or needs, you should consider seeking financial advice from an Australian Financial Services licensee before making a financial decision in relation to any of the matters discussed.
New “EET election” option for discretionary trusts to avoid the minimum 30 per cent without having to restructure, but creates inflexibility.
The rules for SMSF borrowing to acquire real property have now changed. While the policy debate has largely focused on residential property, the final law operates by reference to whether the real property qualifies as business real property under the superannuation rules. This distinction is important for trustees, advisers and lenders considering property transactions from 10 August 2026.
Treasury has released draft regulations supporting the Treasury Laws Amendment (Building a Stronger and Fairer Super System) Act 2026, which introduced the new Division 296 tax on superannuation balances exceeding $3m and $10m. The regulations provide the long awaited operational detail on how the new tax will work in practice, particularly for defined benefit interests, large Australian Prudential Regulation Authority funds and Self-managed Superannuation Funds.