High Court decision strengthens GST refund positions for developers
Client AlertHigh Court decision strengthens GST refund positions for developers
Federal Budget Virtual Seminar: expert insights on spending, tax reform and policy impacts. Register now.
It is designed to counter the erosion of the Australian tax base by multinational entities using artificial and contrived arrangements to avoid the attribution of profits to a permanent establishment (PE) in Australia.
The MAAL applies to income years commencing on or after 1 January 2016 and will not be applied retrospectively.
The MAAL only applies to “Significant Global Entities” which can be defined as:
The 2017-18 Federal Budget extended the scope of the MAAL so that it applies to:
The primary condition for the MAAL to apply is that it is reasonable to conclude that there was a ‘Principal Purpose’ of obtaining either an Australian or foreign tax benefit. This Principle Purpose test is the same as the Diverted Profits Tax and lowers the evidentiary hurdle of ‘sole and dominant purpose’ contained in Part IVA, the general anti-avoidance rules for income tax.
The threshold for breaching these new rules will be based on the “Principal Purpose” test for schemes entered into, on or after 1 January 2016. This is a lower hurdle for the ATO to demonstrate that the sole and dominant purpose be contained in Australian anti-avoidance legislation
The MAAL applies in the following circumstances:
If the above requirements are met, there may be additional tax payable on transactions deemed subject to Australian tax and/or withholding tax where sales are made through an Australian PE. Furthermore, the ATO has highlighted that unprecedented penalties will be applicable should the taxpayer engage in tax avoidance schemes.
Non-compliance with MAAL will be treated harshly and could result in substantial penalties up to an additional 120 per cent of the tax avoided under the scheme entered into by the relevant entities. For companies with exposure to MAAL, the impact of the added tax burden and steep penalties would have a significant impact.
However, financial penalties for breach of MAAL can be reduced substantially by having a Reasonably Arguable Position (RAP) paper. For example, should the ATO find that an affected taxpayer has breached MAAL, any penalty can be reduced to 30% if the taxpayer has a RAP. It is important that steps are taken to consider the impact of MAAL on any taxpayers and arrangements that may be subject to these rules.
High Court decision strengthens GST refund positions for developers
Compare key R&D tax incentive regimes worldwide. See how global innovation funding, benefit levels, and eligibility differ across major jurisdictions.
Foreign resident CGT reforms expand taxable Australian real property, withholding and renewables discount.