Managing macroeconomic risks through proactive stress testing
Client alertProactive stress testing to manage macroeconomic risk, strengthen financial stability and banking
Federal Budget Virtual Seminar: expert insights on spending, tax reform and policy impacts. Register now.
Customer-Owned Banking Institutions – also known as mutual banks and credit unions – are the current focus. The latest changes are set to provide more clarity around the application of a GST ‘safe harbour’ rate for a COBI’s acquisitions, yet require strict reporting to validate its application.
The ATO has just published its finalised ‘Practical Compliance Guideline’ for mutual banks and credit unions. The focus of the Guidelines is around the ATO’s approach to applying the 18 per cent ‘safe harbour’ rate for Customer-Owned Banking Institutions (COBIs). This new approach can provide COBIs with cost and administrative saving opportunities.
Put simply, a ‘safe harbour’ is a matter of practical administration offered by the ATO that will enable eligible banks and credit unions to minimise compliance costs for GST recovery.
Under the new Guideline, the ATO will accept a rate of no more than 18 per cent as a ‘safe harbour’ for the extent of a COBI’s GST creditable purpose in the following circumstances:
The Guideline applies to tax periods starting with effect from 1 July 2017. For periods prior to this date, opportunities exist for COBI’s to undertake a review of GST apportionment methodologies to recover additional input tax credits.
For tax governance purposes, COBIs should ensure sufficient analysis exists to substantiate why it applied the 18 per cent rate to the either the 1st or 2nd category of above acquisitions.
We regularly work with clients to help them identify and apply changes coming from the ATO in a coordinated way, as well as meet the tax governance reporting requirements linked to transparency. Get in touch with the team.
Proactive stress testing to manage macroeconomic risk, strengthen financial stability and banking
In July 2025, we wrote about the Federal Court’s decision in S.N.A Group Pty Ltd v Commissioner of Taxation [2025] FCA 240, which was widely seen as a ‘commercial reality’ endorsement for inter entity service fee arrangements in closely held groups – where documentation is known to be imperfect.
The AUSTRAC AML/CTF Starter Programs provide a structured pathway to achieving AML/CTF compliance that will significantly reduce the effort and cost of AML/CTF compliance for entities required to meet AML/CTF obligations under Tranche 2.