Navigating the US retail landscape: key considerations for Australian businesses
InsightUS retail expansion: sales tax nexus, compliance and key tax considerations for Australian retailers.
Congratulations to our new Partners and Principal. Read more now.
By: Jason Casas, Christine Cornish, Keith To, Rashtin Fazal
23 Jun 20256 min read
The draft guidance details extensive analysis that needs to be performed and places increased expectation on the information taxpayers need to gather to evidence the arm’s length quantum of inbound loans from related parties. Also of interest is the ATO’s difference of opinion on guarantees to boost borrowing capacity. It will be intriguing to see how this interplays with their long-standing position on implicit guarantees when pricing debt.
The Draft Practical Compliance Guideline PCG 2025/D2 ('PCG 2025/D2' or ‘the Draft Guideline’) responds to recent changes in thin capitalisation and transfer pricing laws, effective from 1 July 2023. The ATO clarifies that transfer pricing rules take precedence when applying the new thin capitalisation regime – meaning taxpayers must first prove their debt amount and interest rate are arm’s length.
If all or part of the debt amount is not considered arm’s length, the interest debt deduction associated with the excess debt is not deductible.
For those managing inbound related party financing, here are some guidelines to comply with ATO expectations.
PCG 2025/D2 applies to taxpayers that are general class investors that have entered inbound cross border related party financing arrangements. The draft guidance is also relevant to some financial entities that have chosen to apply the third-party debt test.
When finalised, the Draft Guideline is proposed to apply to income years commencing on or after 1 July 2023 to all new and existing arrangements.
The Draft Guideline advises taxpayers to evaluate financing options that are realistically available to them, such as relying on internally generated funds, raising equity capital, or securing debt capital. The Draft PCG 2025/D2 outlines several qualitative factors the ATO will consider:
Similar to other Practical Compliance Guidelines issued by the ATO, PCG 2025/D2 contains a risk assessment framework. This outlines the ATO’s compliance approach to a taxpayer’s inbound cross-border related party funding arrangement based on the following four risk zones:
| Risk zone | Criteria | Risk level |
|
Green |
|
|
|
Blue |
|
|
|
Red |
|
|
|
White |
|
|
The PCG 2025/D2 reiterates the importance of preparing and maintaining transfer pricing documentation along with detailed analysis to support the quantum of the taxpayer’s inbound, cross-border related party financing arrangement. Documentation that may be requested by the ATO includes:
The Draft Guideline provides clear insights into the ATO’s approach and expectations. Aligning existing financing arrangements to the ATO’s risk framework and documentation guidelines will be key to managing risks and avoiding penalties.
If you would like to discuss any of the information contained in this article, please get in touch.
US retail expansion: sales tax nexus, compliance and key tax considerations for Australian retailers.
The ATO’s draft PCG 2026/D1 introduces a new compliance framework for attributing risk weighted assets to Australian branches of foreign banks, reshaping thin capitalisation methodologies and documentation expectations.
PepsiCo embedded royalties, ATO Decision Impact Statement, embedded royalties Australia, royalty withholding tax, diverted profits tax, intellectual property payments, IP arrangements Australia, multinational tax Australia, ATO royalties guidance