Federal Budget 2026-27: expert insights on spending, tax reform and policy impacts. Visit hub.
Its guidance is designed to ensure that multinational enterprises (MNEs) adhere to the arm’s length principle when pricing cross-border transactions with related parties. The ATO’s approach is grounded in both domestic legislation – particularly Division 815 of the Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 – and international standards such as the OECD Transfer Pricing Guidelines.
A clear understanding of the ATO’s risk-based approach is critical to managing exposure, avoiding disputes and demonstrating defensible positions.
The ATO uses Practical Compliance Guidelines (PCGs) to assess transfer pricing risk in real terms. These guidelines help frame how the ATO views common arrangements and where it is likely to focus its attention which can help assess risk early and avoid surprises.
Key guidelines include:
Operating outside the ATO’s low‑risk green zones increases the chance of review or audit. A proactive view of PCGs helps manage exposure before issues escalate.
Strong documentation sits at the heart of transfer pricing compliance. Large multinational groups face country by country reporting, including master files and local files. Many other taxpayers must lodge an International Dealings Schedule with their tax return once thresholds are met.
These lodgements give the ATO deep visibility over related‑party transactions, counterparties and pricing methods. Inadequate documentation increases the risk of penalties and deeper regulatory scrutiny. In other words, robust documentation is a frontline defence and helps mitigate regulatory risk.
Transfer pricing reviews often start with a high‑level risk assessment based on lodged information and financial results. Where the ATO sees higher risk, matters can progress to a formal audit with detailed information requests and economic analysis.
Early preparation and a clear narrative reduce disruption and helps manage the risk of escalation. Waiting for the ATO to raise questions rarely leads to better outcomes.
Our support can help organisations lead with confidence rather than react under pressure. Work typically includes:
By addressing ATO expectations early, uncertainty reduces and decision‑making improves. Imagine a transfer pricing position that is clear, defensible and built for growth. A conversation today can help move your transfer pricing approach from compliance driven to purpose led.
The ATO’s draft PCG 2026/D1 introduces a new compliance framework for attributing risk weighted assets to Australian branches of foreign banks, reshaping thin capitalisation methodologies and documentation expectations.
PepsiCo embedded royalties, ATO Decision Impact Statement, embedded royalties Australia, royalty withholding tax, diverted profits tax, intellectual property payments, IP arrangements Australia, multinational tax Australia, ATO royalties guidance
US tariffs and IEEPA changes impacts on Australian exporters and trade compliance.
Subscribe now to be kept up-to-date with timely and relevant insights, unique to the nature of your business, your areas of interest and the industry in which you operate.
Tax Agents Disclosures
The Tax Practitioners Board maintains a register of tax agents and BAS agents. You can access and search this register here. This register includes details of the registration (and conditions if applicable) of Grant Thornton and our individual registered tax agents with whom you engage.
Your engagement letter with Grant Thornton and the Standard Terms and Conditions set out our procedures for dealing with problems or complaints. The Tax Practitioners Board also has a complaints process in relation to tax agent services as outlined on their website which can be accessed here.
Tax agents have obligations to the Tax Practitioners Board and to their clients. You also have obligations under the taxation laws and to your tax agent. Please refer to these obligations on the TPB website or the TPB’s fact sheet "Information for Clients".
Section 45 of the Tax Agent Services (Code of Professional Conduct) requires Grant Thornton to notify you if it becomes aware of certain events which have occurred in the past 5 years. Grant Thornton is not aware of any such events.