Payday Super regulations released – understanding the new administrative uplift
Client AlertPayday Super regulations explained: how the new administrative uplift works and what employers must do next
Expert-led tax essentials delivering practical insights and strategic foresight. Learn more.

Two years later, businesses and employees have embraced the positive impact of working from home and the value in being agile in response to potential restrictions or virus variants. But as organisations discuss ongoing flexible work arrangements, and the support and equipment to allow employees to work from home, what Fringe Benefits Tax (FBT) implications, concessions and exemptions should be considered?
Since 2020, businesses were able to take advantage of Federal and State financial support, including FBT concessions and exemptions available for certain benefits provided to employees under their new working from home arrangements. These span across equipment to work from home, health benefits, car parking, as well as considerations such as the FBT implications of the provision of Rapid Antigen Tests for work purposes.
In addition, the way in which these benefits are provided and the structure of arrangements can make a significant difference to tax outcomes, accessibility of concessions and reductions. Especially for large organisations, ensuring the provision of benefits is structured strategically when seeking to support employees can lead to substantial savings or the avoidance of large unexpected FBT costs
To ensure businesses leverage tax efficiencies available, now is the time to consider this year’s FBT implications and future benefits for employees continuing to work from home. As these arrangements can be highly complex, please don’t hesitate to reach out to our team to discuss reviewing the tax-effectiveness of your current arrangements, as well as tips and traps to look out for.
Payday Super regulations explained: how the new administrative uplift works and what employers must do next
In July 2025, we wrote about the Federal Court’s decision in S.N.A Group Pty Ltd v Commissioner of Taxation [2025] FCA 240, which was widely seen as a ‘commercial reality’ endorsement for inter entity service fee arrangements in closely held groups – where documentation is known to be imperfect.
What Australia’s Carbon Leakage Review means for trade, imports and business costs