ATO raises the evidence bar for treaty claims through fiscally transparent entities
Client alertATO guidance increases evidence requirements for treaty claims through FTE structures.
Grant Thornton Australia joins Grant Thornton Advisors multinational platform. Read more.
01 Jun 2018 3 min read
As of the 31st of July 2018 Australian financial institutions must comply with the CRS in addition to the current obligation to comply with the Foreign Account Tax Compliance Act (FATCA).
Non-compliance with the reporting obligations increases the reputational risk of Australian financial institutions. As such, adherence to the reporting obligations should become an integral part of a financial institution's risk management and governance procedures.
All financial institutions will need to undertake a process to classify each legal entity within its group according to CRS. More than one classification may apply to an entity.
It is important to note that definitions under CRS may differ to the FATCA Agreement and therefore apply differently to financial institutions. Entities that were not subject to FATCA may be subject to CRS. Broadly, all financial institutions are required to comply with the CRS, including but not limited to, banks, mutuals, platforms and trusts.
In order to comply with your reporting obligations a financial institution must:
Due diligence procedures will need to be undertaken to determine whether financial accounts are reportable. The procedures will depend on whether:
Grant Thornton’s Financial Services team can advise on your position under CRS and your reporting requirements by:
ATO guidance increases evidence requirements for treaty claims through FTE structures.
The Association of Superannuation Funds of Australia (ASFA), in collaboration with JANA, has released its final Investment Manager Operational Due Diligence (ODD) Guidance Note, providing a practical framework to strengthen how superannuation funds assess and oversee operational risk
As debate intensifies ahead of the Federal Budget, this insight examines why incremental tax changes are no longer sufficient for Australia. It argues for meaningful, productivity‑focused tax reform that addresses growing reliance on personal income tax, system complexity and long‑term budget sustainability, while carefully considering broader reforms such as the GST to ensure fairness and economic resilience.