Managing macroeconomic risks through proactive stress testing
Client alertProactive stress testing to manage macroeconomic risk, strengthen financial stability and banking
Federal Budget Virtual Seminar: expert insights on spending, tax reform and policy impacts. Register now.
A financial accommodation does not need to be direct funding of a specific monetary value – it could be a supply of infrastructure, equipment, signage, or a short-term lease.
Similarly, the 'repayment' of the financial accommodation arrangements can take various forms and is not necessarily directly linked to the items/funding provided initially. The repayment could be based on the subsequent purchase of goods to a particular value, a commission, or a percentage of profits from the business within a certain period.
Consider these real-world examples:
If you provide the types of financial accommodations described above or other types of financial accommodations, you may inadvertently be providing a service designated by the AML/CTF Act. Your business may have obligations under the AML/CTF Act including needing to enrol with AUSTRAC.
Since November 2023, the financial penalties for non-enrolment with AUSTRAC have increased from a single financial penalty of $18,780 to $18,780 for each day non-enrolment continues.
We have worked with businesses from a number of industry sectors who have discovered they may have inadvertently been providing financial accommodation to assess whether they need to enrol with AUSTRAC and develop strategies to minimise regulatory impact and mitigate any financial penalties.
Contact our experts today if you would like more information or to discuss whether the AML/CTF Act could cover your financial accommodations.
Proactive stress testing to manage macroeconomic risk, strengthen financial stability and banking
Grant Thornton worked with AUSTRAC (the federal Anti-Money Laundering regulator) to support the development of their new AML/CTF Starter Kits released this week, designed specifically for Tranche 2 sectors including lawyers, real estate professionals, accountants, and conveyancers.
The Federal Court’s $5.8M ACL decision signals a new era for privacy, cybersecurity, and governance in Australia. It reinforces that privacy and cyber obligations start Day 1 of any acquisition, governance failures will be scrutinised, and accountability cannot be outsourced. Boards must ensure robust oversight, deep cyber due diligence, and forensic incident response. With OAIC escalating regulatory enforcement, organisations face heightened legal, financial, and reputational risks.