Managing macroeconomic risks through proactive stress testing
Client alertProactive stress testing to manage macroeconomic risk, strengthen financial stability and banking
The Remarkables podcast: Stories of people improving communities and inspiring youth. Listen now.

The Fraud Triangle is a concept that outlines the motivations behind why individuals commit workplace fraud.
The three key elements responsible for fraud are:
In the current environment of rising living expenses due to inflation, interest rate increases, and higher costs of services and labour, most people are experiencing heightened financial “pressure”.
Exacerbating these existing pressures, wages and salaries are not keeping up with the macro environment, imposing additional strain and pressure on the disposable household income. This may result in employees “rationalising” the need to receive more from their employer. This often starts with inconsequential behaviour such as taking home more office stationery, or utilising business assets for personal use (such as plant and fleet assets, corporate and fuel cards, or corporate subscriptions for services such as background or credit checks); gradually progressing to more sophisticated and serious fraud such as manipulating overtime records or misappropriating funds.
Given the current scenario where both pressure and rationalisation coexist, it is more important than ever for organisations to have effective and fit for purpose mitigates of fraud – or reduce the ‘opportunity’ – as much as possible.
With the current climate potentially resulting in higher attempts of fraudulent activities and many organisations now considering Internal Audit Programs, it is the perfect time to ensure Internal Audit has a strong focus on assessing fraud controls in all reviews performed.
An Internal Audit is a valuable tool that organisations can use to conduct a comprehensive fraud assessment throughout the entire company. At the very least, fraud can be prioritised as a central focus for all reviews conducted, specifically outlining it within scoping and terms of reference.
Absolutely not, and there is no guarantee. However, it is a great way to communicate to all stakeholders that fraud is on the radar, discouraging fraudulent activities from occurring within the organisation.
Additionally, it will provide management and Boards the opportunity to enhance and strengthen control measures, mitigating fraud risks and reporting crucial insights into key strength areas to management and the Board.
An Internal Audit can also contribute to the creation and evaluation of continuous monitoring tools aimed at detecting possible warning signs such as excessive overtime, unusual expenses, patterns, and anomalies, and support your organisation to identify, evaluate, mitigate, and oversee fraud risks.
If you have been contemplating conducting an internal audit or you’d simply like to learn more, please don't hesitate to get in touch with us.
Proactive stress testing to manage macroeconomic risk, strengthen financial stability and banking
Grant Thornton worked with AUSTRAC (the federal Anti-Money Laundering regulator) to support the development of their new AML/CTF Starter Kits released this week, designed specifically for Tranche 2 sectors including lawyers, real estate professionals, accountants, and conveyancers.
Australia’s AML/CTF reforms represent a fundamental shift from a prescriptive, compliance-based regime to a flexible, outcomes-focused framework – prioritising the effective prevention of money laundering, terrorism financing and proliferation financing, rather than merely following prescriptive rules.